Compartir
Hayes vs Conn Debate, Modalism: Modalistic Monarchianism, A Proper Paradigm For Oneness Theology
Mike Conn
(Autor)
·
Bishop Jerry L. Hayes
(Autor)
·
Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
· Tapa Blanda
Hayes vs Conn Debate, Modalism: Modalistic Monarchianism, A Proper Paradigm For Oneness Theology - Conn, Mike ; Hayes, Bishop Jerry L.
Sin Stock
Te enviaremos un correo cuando el libro vuelva a estar disponible
Reseña del libro "Hayes vs Conn Debate, Modalism: Modalistic Monarchianism, A Proper Paradigm For Oneness Theology"
Hayes vs Conn, Debate, Modalism is truly the first of its kind. Both Bishop Jerry Hayes and Pastor Mike Conn are Oneness Pentecostal believers and, yet, they are at disagreement over the paradigm of Modalistic Monarchianism as being a proper structure for the Oneness Godhead theology. In this debate Bishop Hayes takes the affirmative position in behalf of Modalism, Pastor Conn the negative.The debate is structured thusly: Three Position Papers each of 3,000 words or less, for a total of six. Then there are 230 personal exchanges between the two further expounding on the Position Papers. After which there are two Summation Papers: one for the Affirmative and one for the Negative.The battleground of this discussion centers on two main points: 1. the proper definition of Modalism and 2. the proper understanding of the Dual Nature of Christ.