Compartir
Security Clearances: Due Process for Denials and Revocations by Defense, Energy, and State: Nsiad-92-99 (en Inglés)
U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Autor)
·
Bibliogov
· Tapa Blanda
Security Clearances: Due Process for Denials and Revocations by Defense, Energy, and State: Nsiad-92-99 (en Inglés) - U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (
18,61 €
20,68 €
Ahorras: 2,07 €
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: Estados Unidos
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Miércoles 14 de Agosto y el
Miércoles 28 de Agosto.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de España entre 1 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "Security Clearances: Due Process for Denials and Revocations by Defense, Energy, and State: Nsiad-92-99 (en Inglés)"
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the due process practices at the Departments of Defense (DOD), Energy (DOE), and State for individuals that have security clearances denied or revoked, focusing on: (1) the agencies' practices for suspending individuals' security clearances; (2) whether the agencies give individuals access to their investigative records; and (3) whether appeals of unfavorable decisions are heard by independent decisionmakers who document their decisions. GAO found that: (1) the three agencies do not require that letters be sent to individuals to advise them when and why their clearances are suspended; (2) 70 percent of the individuals in the Army, Navy, and Air Force whose access or clearances were suspended for security reasons did not get their cases adjudicated by the services' central clearance offices and, as a result, their clearances were never formally revoked but were left indefinitely suspended; (4) the annual DOD report on clearance activity did not accurately show the number of clearances revoked or indefinitely suspended for security reasons; (5) State letters to individuals informing them of unfavorable security clearance actions also included information regarding procedures for gaining access to investigative material about themselves; (6) DOD and DOE regulations do not require that letters to individuals contain guidance to gain access to investigative material; (7) the three agencies have established procedures for employees to appeal unfavorable security clearance determinations; (8) DOE uses independent individuals to hear appeals and make recommendations; and (9) DOD and State use officials with administrative ties to the organizations responsible for clearance determinations, so their appeal boards do not appear to be administratively independent.
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
Todos los libros de nuestro catálogo son Originales.
El libro está escrito en Inglés.
La encuadernación de esta edición es Tapa Blanda.
✓ Producto agregado correctamente al carro, Ir a Pagar.